This site is intended only for healthcare professionals resident in Indonesia

Search

Menu

Close

Sign InLog Out
Our MedicinesContact UsMedical InformationLet's ConnectContact us

Adverse event reporting can be found at the bottom of the page

Menu

Close

About CIBINQO Efficacy EfficacyOverview Efficacy of CIBINQO vs dupilumab Efficacy of CIBINQO + Medicated Topicals Efficacy of CIBINQO Without Medicated Topicals Efficacy in Teens (12-<18) Reduction in Risk of Flares Long-term Efficacy Results Before and After Photos Glossary Safety SafetySafety Profile Safety Considerations Lab Abnormalities Dosing & Monitoring Dosing &
Monitoring
Dosing Lab Monitoring
Support & Resources Support & ResourcesEvents Materials Videos

Click here for CIBINQO Prescribing Information. Adverse event reporting information can be found at the bottom of the page.

Efficacy of CIBINQO vs dupilumab

JADE DARE was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, head-to-head phase 3b trial that compared the efficacy and safety of CIBINQO 200 mg + TCS vs dupilumab + TCS in 727 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD.1,2

Itch Relief

Skin Clearance

XXX

See full trial design >

Fast and superior itch relief in one day after the first dose with CIBINQO 200 mg + TCS vs dupilumab + TCS1

Additional information1
PP-NRS4 response for CIBINQO vs dupilumab at week 2 was a primary endpoint controlled for multiplicity. The onset of pruritus relief was assessed through a step-down approach, day by day, from week 2 to earlier time points once statistical significance was demonstrated at week 2, at the 5% level of significance. P value at Day 2 is controlled for multiplicity for the family of PP-NRS4 comparisons. 

TCS includes low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids and other medicated topicals. 
TCS=topical corticosteroids; AD=atopic dermatitis; PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale; QD=once a day; Q2W=every 2 weeks. 
In a post hoc analysis,
CIBINQO 200 mg + TCS showed complete or almost complete itch relief as early as week 22

Data limitations2
PP-NRS 0/1 response was a post hoc analysis and the P values are nominal. Therefore, treatment differences could represent chance findings and no conclusions regarding any comparisons can
be made. 

PP-NRS 0/1 is defined as complete or almost complete itch relief as measured by the PP-NRS scale. 
TCS includes low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids and other medicated topicals.1
Analyzed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned patients who received ≥1 dose of study medication). If a patient withdrew from the study or used rescue therapy, then this patient was counted as a nonresponder after that point. 
CIBINQO 200 mg + TCS demonstrated rapid and superior improvement vs dupilumab + TCS in a head-to-head study1JADE DARE Study DesignTCS includes low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids arid other medical lopicals. 

Primary endpoints:

  • PP-NRS4 response at week 2 vs dupilumab
  • EASl-90 response at week 4 vs dupilumab
Key secondary endpoint:
  • EASl-90 response at week 16 vs dupilumab
TCS includes low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids and other medicated topicals. Patients randomised to dupilumab received a loading dose of 600 mg.At week 26, eligible subjects had the option to enter JADE EXTEND; all other subjects entered the 4-week
off­-treatment follow-up period.3
AD=atopic dermatitis; QD=once a day; Q2W=every 2 weeks; SC=subcutaneous; PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale; EASl=Eczema Area and Severity Index. 
Explore more Have Any Questions About Efficacy?
​​​
Request an eRep Call Loading
Skin Clearance With CIBINQO + Medicated Topicals1 See Results Loading
References:Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10348):273-282.Reich K, Valenzuela F, Hong HC, et al. Onset and depth of response with abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: analysis of the phase 3b JADE DARE clinical trial. Oral presentation 681. Presented at: 3rd Annual Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis Virtual Conference: 11-13 December 2021.ClinicalTrials.gov. Protocol title: A phase 3b randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active controlled multi-center study assessing the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib compared with dupilumab in adult participants on background topical therapy with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04345367. Updated 14 August 2020. Accessed 20 December 2022. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/67/NCT04345367/Prot_000.pdf

See full trial design >

Superior skin clearance: ~2x as many patients achieved >90% clearer skin with CIBINQO 200 mg + TCS at week 4 vs dupilumab + TCS1TCS includes low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids and other medicated topicals. 
Analyzed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned patients who received ≥1 dose of study medication). If a patient withdrew from the study or used rescue therapy, then this patient was counted as a nonresponder after that point.
TCS=topical corticosteroids; AD=atopic dermatitis; EASl=Eczema Area and Severity lndex; QD=once a day; Q2W=every 2 weeks. In a post hoc analysis, 
Completely clear skin was shown as early as week 4 with CIBINQO 200 mg + TCS2,3
Data limitations2,3
EASl-100 response was a post hoc analysis and the P values are nominal. Therefore, treatment differences could represent chance findings and no conclusions regarding any comparisons can be made. 
TCS includes low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids and other medicated topicals.1
Analyzed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned patients who received ≥1 dose of study medication). If a patient withdrew from the study or used rescue therapy, then this patient was counted as a nonresponder after that point.
CIBINQO 200 mg + TCS demonstrated rapid and superior improvement vs dupilumab + TCS in a head-to-head study1JADE DARE Study Design

Primary endpoints:

  • PP-NRS4 response at week 2 vs dupilumab
  • EASl-90 response at week 4 vs dupilumab

Key secondary endpoint:

  • EASl-90 response at week 16 vs dupilumab
TCS includes low- to medium-potency topical corticosteroids and other medicated topicals. Patients randomised to dupilumab received a loading dose of 600 mg.At week 26, eligible subjects had the option to enter JADE EXTEND; all other subjects entered the 4-week
off-treatment follow-up period.4
AD=atopic dermatitis; QD=once a day; Q2W=every 2 weeks; SC=subcutaneous; PP-NRS=Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale; EASl=Eczema Area and Severity Index.
Explore more Have Any Questions About Efficacy?
​​​​​​​
Request an eRep Call Loading
Quality of Life Improvements With CIBINQO + Medicated Topicals5-9 See Results Loading
References:Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to­-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10348):273-282.Reich K, Valenzuela F, Hong HC, et al. Onset and depth of response with abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: analysis of the phase 3b JADE DARE clinical trial. Oral presentation 681. Presented at: 3rd Annual Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis Virtual Conference: 11-13 December 2021.Reich K, Thyssen JP, Blauvelt A, et al. Supplementary appendix to: Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10348):273-282.ClinicalTrials.gov. Protocol title: A phase 3b randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active controlled multi-center study assessing the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib compared with dupilumab in adult participants on background topical therapy with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04345367. Updated 14 August 2020. Accessed 20 December 2022. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/67/NCT04345367/Prot_000.pdf[placeholder for local label]Thyssen JP, Yosipovitch G, Paul C, et al. Supplementary appendix to: Patient-reported outcomes from the JADE COMPARE randomized phase 3 study of abrocitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(3):434-443.Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, et al. Supplementary appendix to: Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(12):1101-1112.Basra MKA, Salek MS, Camilleri L, Sturkey R, Finlay AY. Determining the minimal clinically important difference and responsiveness of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): further data. Dermatology. 2015;230(1):27-33.McMichael A, Cork M, Teng J, et al. Patient-reported outcomes with abrocitinib treatment in adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from the phase 3 JADE TEEN study. Oral presentation. Presented at: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2021 Virtual Annual Meeting; 26 February-1 March 2021.
Efficacy

Ready to get a patient started?

The CIBINQO Treatment Guide can help.​​​​​
​​​​​​​

Download Treatment Guide Loading
PP-ABR-GLB-0237

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at [email protected]

PP-UNP-IDN-0740-JUL-2025

PfizerPro AccountPfizerPro Account

To access further materials, resources and receive communication about medicines and vaccines promoted by Pfizer.

Sign inRegisterAccountSign Out

​​​​Copyright © 2021 Pfizer Limited, Indonesia. All rights reserved. Applicable for Pfizer Products, Product Microsites and Therapy Areas section of the website:


​​​​​​​All content published herein is intended and strictly only for informational, educational, academic and/or research purposes and shall not be utilized to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease without referring to the full prescribing information for list of approved indications as contained in the product package insert.

While due care and caution has been taken to ensure that the content herein is free from mistakes or omissions, Pfizer makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information herein.
​​​​​​​These pages are not intended for patients or for members of the general public. The web pages contain promotional content. For the use only of Registered Medical Practitioners or a Hospital or a Laboratory. Full prescribing information available on request.